As wearable technology advances, smart frames are emerging as a promising assistive tool for individuals who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013; Cook & Polgar, 2015; Fulton, 2022). Devices such as Echo Frames, Google Glass, and heARsight glasses provide voice-activated support, live captioning, and real-time environmental awareness features (Amazon, 2023). While their potential in AAC is recognized, little is known about how clinicians perceive, evaluate, or implement these tools in practice.
This presentation reports findings from two baseline studies and a case study examining smart frames’ practical use, professional perceptions, and future implications. The first study surveyed speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and audiologists to assess awareness, training, and perceived clinical value of smart frames for individuals who are Deaf or hard of hearing. Results such as limited training, uncertainty in effectiveness, and demographic differences in comfort and interest will be discussed (Bossert & Swain, 2025). The presentation will highlight participants’ interest in smart frames, alongside concerns about cost, limited compatibility, and lack of access to relevant professional development.
The second study surveyed vision specialists—optometrists and opticians—on their familiarity with smart frames and experiences recommending them to clients with disabilities. Results such as low awareness of available brands, concerns about lens prescriptions and fit, and limited assistive technology training will be presented (Layman & Meza, 2025). The need for interdisciplinary collaboration when determining smart frame suitability for clients with complex communication and access needs will also be discussed.
A case study of an individual with a spinal cord injury offers functional insight into smart frame use compared to traditional Smart Speakers with Voice Control (SSVCs). Benefits included portability, hands-free access, and independence when using smart home technology. Challenges such as Bluetooth disconnection and limited customization will also be addressed (Layman & Meza, 2025).
All studies were guided by the Participation Model (Beukelman & Mirenda, 2013) and the Human Activity Assistive Technology (HAAT) Model (Cook & Polgar, 2015), which emphasize matching assistive technology to user needs, tasks, and environments. These frameworks helped frame the alignment between existing smart frame capabilities and AAC user goals in diverse contexts.
Findings show that while smart frames hold promise, most professionals lack the knowledge and confidence to recommend them. This signals the need for targeted training and interdisciplinary planning when introducing smart wearable technologies into AAC care plans. Implications for practice include structured training modules, integration with existing AAC evaluations, and co-designed strategies to ensure usability and success in real-world environments.
The presentation will also outline future research directions, including co-design projects with AAC users, further pilot testing in clinical and educational settings, and evaluation of smart frames’ role in supporting community-based participation. By prioritizing collaboration with individuals who use AAC, their caregivers, and interdisciplinary teams, researchers can develop inclusive solutions that reflect functional, day-to-day needs.
This session is ideal for SLPs, audiologists, vision specialists, AT professionals, and educators looking to expand their knowledge of wearable AAC-related technologies. Attendees will gain insight into how smart frames are perceived across disciplines, how they compare to traditional AAC tools, and what steps are needed to responsibly integrate them into practice
To foster interactive learning, participants will complete brief pre- and post-session surveys using Poll Everywhere or Qualtrics. These will assess prior exposure to smart frames, expectations for learning, and any changes in understanding or interest following the session. Survey data will be shared with attendees in real time to encourage discussion and idea-sharing.
References
Amazon. (2023). Amazon Echo Frames product documentation. https://www.amazon.com
Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication (4th ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Bossert, C., & Swain, M. (2025). SLPs and audiologists’ perspectives: Benefits of using smart frames with DHoH individuals. Symposium submission.
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2015). Assistive technologies: Principles and practice (4th ed.). Elsevier.
Fulton, J. (2022). AI and accessibility: The potential of wearable smart frames. Journal of Assistive Tech Development, 18(2), 45–52.
Layman, G., & Meza, K. (2025). Piecing together smart frames: Vision specialists’ and case study insights. ATIA 2025 Orlando Conference presentation.
